Search for: All records

5G Millimeter Wave (mmWave) technology holds great promise for Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) due to its ability to achieve data rates in the Gbps range. However, mmWave suffers from a high beamforming overhead and requirement of line of sight (LOS) to maintain a strong connection. For Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) scenarios, where CAVs connect to roadside units (RSUs), these drawbacks become apparent. Because vehicles are dynamic, there is a large potential for link blockages. These blockages are detrimental to the connected applications running on the vehicle, such as cooperative perception and remote driver takeover. Existing RSU selection schemes base their decisions on signal strength and vehicle trajectory alone, which is not enough to prevent the blockage of links. Many modern CAVs motion planning algorithms routinely use other vehicle’s near-future path plans, either by explicit communication among vehicles, or by prediction. In this paper, we make use of the knowledge of other vehicle’s near future path plans to further improve the RSU association mechanism for CAVs. We solve the RSU association algorithm by converting it to a shortest path problem with the objective to maximize the total communication bandwidth. We evaluate our approach, titled B-AWARE, in simulation using Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) and Digital twin for self-dRiving Intelligent VEhicles (DRIVE) on 12 highway and city street scenarios with varying traffic density and RSU placements. Simulations show B-AWARE results in a 1.05× improvement of the potential datarate in the average case and 1.28× in the best case vs. the state-of-the-art. But more impressively, B-AWARE reduces the time spent with no connection by 42% in the average case and 60% in the best case as compared to the state-of-the-art methods. This is a result of B-AWARE reducing nearly 100% of blockage occurrences. 

Different types of lane-changing assistance systems are usually developed separately by different automotive makers or suppliers. A lane-changing model can meet its own requirements, but it may be incompatible with another lane-changing model. In this paper, we verify if two lane-changing models are compatible so that the two corresponding vehicles on different lanes can exchange their lanes successfully. We propose a methodology and an algorithm to perform the verification on the combinations of four lane-changing models. Experimental results demonstrate the compatibility (or incompatibility) between the models. The verification results can be utilized during runtime to prevent incompatible vehicles from entering a lane-changing road segment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work considering the compatibility issue for lane-changing models. 

Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) are expected to enable reliable and efficient transportation systems. Most motion planning algorithms for multi-agent systems are not completely safe because they implicitly assume that all vehicles/agents will execute the expected plan with a small error. This assumption, however, is hard to keep for CAVs since they may have to slow down (e.g., to yield to a jaywalker) or are forced to stop (e.g. break down), sometimes even without a notice. Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) defines a set of safety rules for each driving scenario to ensure that a vehicle will not cause an accident irrespective of other vehicles' behavior. RSS rules, however, are hard to evaluate for merge, intersection, and unstructured road scenarios. In addition, deadlock situations can happen that are not considered by the RSS. In this paper, we propose a generic version of RSS rules for CAVs that can be applied to any driving scenario. We integrate the proposed RSS rules with the CAV's motion planning algorithm to enable cooperative driving of CAVs. Our approach can also detect and resolve deadlocks in a decentralized manner. We have conducted experiments to verify that a CAV does not cause an accident no matter when other CAVs slow down or stop. We also showcase our deadlock detection and resolution mechanism. Finally, we compare the average velocity and fuel consumption of vehicles when they drive autonomously but not connected with the case that they are connected.